<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Strategic heading by G. Oliver Young &#187; Web 2.0</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.strategicheading.com/category/web-2-0/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.strategicheading.com</link>
	<description>G. Oliver Young's blog about business strategy and technology.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 22:00:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Web 2.0 Is Dead &#8212; As A Common Phrase Anyway</title>
		<link>http://blog.strategicheading.com/2009/07/31/web-2-0-is-dead-as-a-common-phrase-anyway/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.strategicheading.com/2009/07/31/web-2-0-is-dead-as-a-common-phrase-anyway/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 18:00:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Branding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enterprise 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web 2.0]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linkedin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.strategicheading.com/?p=542</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, dead may be a bit of an overstatement, but it is clear that the phrase &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; is dying.
This week my new report &#8220;Inquiry Insights: Web 2.0 And Social Media Technologies, Q1 2009&#8221; hit the Forrester Website. Throughout a given year, Forrester fields thousands of inquiries from clients and non-clients alike . Analyzing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, dead may be a bit of an overstatement, but it is clear that the phrase &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; is dying.</p>
<p>This week my new report &#8220;<a href="http://www.forrester.com/Research/Document/0,7211,47143,00.html">Inquiry Insights: Web 2.0 And Social Media Technologies, Q1 2009</a>&#8221; hit the Forrester Website. Throughout a given year, Forrester fields thousands of inquiries from clients and non-clients alike . Analyzing the nature and frequency of these inquiries — while not yielding statistically significant conclusions — provides a fascinating window into the minds of IT professionals, marketers, and technology vendors concerned with specific topics and often shows major trends in technology interest throughout the technologies&#8217; life cycle.</p>
<p>So what have we seen for the Web 2.0/Social media market? Though the arguments about what to call the market &#8212; consisting of blogs, wikis, social networks, RSS, widgets, etc. &#8212; have mostly faded away, what people call the market is no more settled than it was 3 or 4 years ago. The big shift: a move away from &#8220;Web 2.0&#8243; and a move towards &#8220;social media&#8221; or even more frustratingly towards &#8220;social networking&#8221; as a overarching category (not pictured below).</p>
<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-543" title="Web 2.0 Inquiries" src="http://blog.strategicheading.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/Web-2.0-Inquiries.jpg" alt="Web 2.0 Inquiries" width="491" height="404" />The change has been occurring slowly over the last year or so, with the phrase Web 2.0 hitting its peak among Forrester&#8217;s clients in Q2 2008, and falling off from there. From my point of view <a href="http://battellemedia.com/archives/004939.php">Tim O&#8217;Reilly and John Battelle&#8217;s effort</a> to evolve the phrase into &#8220;Web Squared&#8221; is effort well spent; Web 2.0 had been getting stale and had lost its cachet.</p>
<p>One final note for the Enterprise 2.0 enthusiasts out there, that phrase has clearly not caught on with Forrester&#8217;s clients yet at all. Partly this is due to the fact that &#8212; for reasons I don&#8217;t want to get into  &#8212; Forrester resisted using the phrase for the last couple of years, and partly because Forrester clients interested in Enterprise 2.0 topics <em>also </em>use the phrase social media. It makes life mighty confusing for our inquiry team whose job it is to route the questions to the right analysts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.strategicheading.com/2009/07/31/web-2-0-is-dead-as-a-common-phrase-anyway/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
